Monday, February 18, 2013

DAY NICE: the web team comes AAround

Great surprise this morning: a tweet from @AmericanAir.

Just a flashback from previous episodes: I've booked some tickets for a family holiday around Xmas but they were not ticketed, despite me calling back to check. Since, it appears clearly to me that the reservations department failed to resubmit the transaction as confirmed by BarclayCard and to contact me about it. Obviously, by then the fares had doubled, which meant explaining the kids we were no longer going to see the Grand Canyon.

I've made a bit of a stink about it, on Twittter, Facebook and directly before that with the Customer Relations department.

Following all that, the web team who operates Twitter and Facebook contacted reservations and confirmed that they had never emailed me after all. They then tweeted me yesterday and proposed to reinstate the booking.

IT WORKED!

In about 30 mn after I cam back to them via DM, they had ticketed our booking! WOW.

So what now? We're relived after a few really stressful days. But then, we're looking forward to our holidays. Thank you to the American Airlines web team.

Based on this personal story, here are my thoughts on the customer experience aspects:
  • First, I have to praise @barclaycard who was incredibly responsive. They called me up to do the fraud check the next day, which is annoying but I suppose fine. Then I got them on the phone and that was not very conclusive but then they came back quickly by email. When I tweeted though, they were right away on the case.
  •  Secondly, after some denying and passing on the parcel, the @AmericanAir crew really helped. I'm not sure what went on between them and the reservations department, but I guess they put some pressure. So, thank you web team. I've checked the volumme of comments on Facebook and Twitter, and it's quite impressive. Clearly they're busy!
  • The AA reservation department though is a bit of a mess. There's probably quite a lot of manual processes. They're hard to reach and agents don't seem to have authority to do much, not even escalate a complaint.
  • For customers then, social media (SocMed) is a great new avenue to engage with brands, directly and using channel of choices -it's much easier to tweet or Facebook than waiting 20 mn for an agent.
  • For brands, it can be a way to increase customer satisfaction and loyalty with quicker issue resolution. And also an easier way to trip in public if responses fall short of the mark.


Previous post in this series:
  • American Airlines -DAY FOUR, now own up!
  • American Airlines, give me my booking back!
  • Thursday, February 14, 2013

    DAY FIVE with American Airlines: w're merging with US Air, talk to the hand!

    OK, it's now DAY 5 since I've started my complaint about AA losing my booking.  It's now clear that someone in their reservations department made a mistake by not calling me, I suspect not emailing me and probably not trying to take the payment from my credit card company as confirmed by BarclayCard.

    Yes, their so called "customer relations" doesn't want to be involved in investigating the matter further because they're not "equipped." A feeble excuse and a poor way to treat their customers.

    It's clear now that not only they don't have a single view of the customer, that their reservations and payment processing systems are not quite state of the art, and that more worryingly they don't have a "voice of the customer" office. No wonder they went bust.

    Here's their latest letter (below), you can judge for yourself.

    February 13, 2013

    Dear *****

    Thank you again for contacting us, and I do apologize for the inconvenience this is causing you by being passed on, from department to department.

    I also understand your frustration, however as I had advised you in my previous response, Customer Relations is only equipped to handle and work to resolve a variety of past travel issues and we are not equipped with the systems required to handle or resolve future reservations issues hence we recommend that you contact our Reservations Team for immediate assistance. Our Agents have complete access to the most current schedule and fare information, and are much better equipped to provide assistance for any issues relating to impending / future travel.

    They will be more equipped to assist you, and I do apologize that this has not been the case in the past. Again, as we only deal with past dated travel through Customer Relations, I am afraid I am unable to assist you further.

    M** **, I apologize again for this inconvenience and I do hope you will find a quick resolution to your booking.

    Sincerely,

    Olivia Kacisolomone
    Customer Relations
    American Airlines
    AA Ref#1-809646144

    For security purposes and to protect privacy, our process does not allow for replies to this message. If we can assist you further, please let us know by clicking http://www.aa.com/customerrelations.

    Previous post in the saga:

    Wednesday, February 13, 2013

    American Airlines -DAY FOUR, now own up!

    American Airlines (ex. AMR, now AAMRQ) is probably too busy merging with US Air but in any case, it's no surprise they went busy given the way they treat their customers. It's day four, and the responses we're getting are still "contact that other department" or "your fare is no longer available". That's not good enough, as per my email below.

    If you've missed the beggining of the saga, here's the start: American Airlines, give me my booking back!
    Check also this Facebook thread.


    Re your latest email AA Ref#1-808589557, it is still my intimate conviction that there's a mistake on AA's part.


    I would very much like you to recognise this and rebook my flights at the original price. Passing back the parcel to reservations doesn't help because they don't have the authority to do this.

    1. We have been in touch with you re. this booking, but at no point AA said there was a problem.

    2. I dispute the fact AA has tried to contact me. Actually, I know AA haven't called. And I am convinced AA did not send those emails about a credit card problem.

    3. I heard back from my credit card company who says you HAVE NOT tried to resubmit this transaction. See below.

    Do the right thing please. Own up. Rebook us.

    LL>



    Dear *****


    Thanks for your message.

    I have checked your account and can confirm that there are no Outstanding Authorisations for the amounts you specified on your account at present. This could be because the transaction has either completed, which you can view under 'Recent Transactions', or it may have dropped off your account.

    Outstanding Authorisations are usually held on an account for seven to 10 days before they are either removed or are fully debited upon receipt of the sales voucher receipt from the company or merchant who your account is being debited to.

    An account can only legally be debited once the credit card company is in receipt of the Sales Voucher Receipt. Sales Voucher Receipts are usually received within 7 to 10 days. However, merchants do have six years and one day in which they

    can legally produce the sales voucher receipt. Therefore, an outstanding authorisation could be pending on an account for anytime within that period and then debited to the account.

    I trust this information is of assistance.

    Should you have any further queries, please do not hesitate to contact me again.

    Kind Regards,

    ****
    Customer Service Advisor
    Barclaycard Customer Services

    13/2/13 UPDATE: to my great surprised, BarclayCard actually called me back after my tweet and confirmed that AA did not retry to submit the transaction. My conclusion? AA failed their duties of caring for their customers. And lied. They look bad. Someone screwed up there and they should really own up rather than burying their head in the sand. 
    Top marks for the @barclaycard web team anyway. At least someone's doing their job.

    Tuesday, February 12, 2013

    American Airlines, give me my booking back!

    
    New logo. Old AA.
    Here's my letter to AA tonight, has anyone experienced the same?

    Hello,

    This is a formal complaint after I feel I have exhausted all avenues via different channels. I can't even start to explain how frustrated I am about your customer service procedures, or the lack thereof.

    Here's my story of how AA screwed up our family holidays of a lifetime.

    Until recently, I was really looking forward to taking our two young daughters and my wife into the Wild West, through the Grand Canyon to see the Big Landscapes. The tickets were dear but heck we've saved and we booked long in advance to ensure we'd get a good price.

    CHAPTER ONE: THE ORIGINAL BOOKING
    So, right after Christmas I went onto aa.com and booked some flights. Took us quite a while to figure out the options but it was done and we bought the travel guides.

    CHAPTER TWO: BOOKING NUMBER TWO
    Alas, the next day my credit card company left me a voice mail saying they had a case of suspected fraud. I called them back, confirmed all was OK and they said they'd authorise the transaction. In the evening, I called AA's reservation line -I guess using the **** number because we were staying there with family for the holidays. Ahah, they said, we need to rebook you because the payment was not processed. Which they did. It took a painfully long call to do this but then the agent was nice and I did not yet know it would be the first of a series of calls.

    At that point, they gave me a different booking number: ******. I did not make a note of the first one but I did not think much about it.

    CHAPTER THREE: EVERYTHING'S OKAY
    I logged in the day after and saw my flight as purchased but not ticketed. Hum, I thought. And so I called again to check all was OK with the payments. After all, I used my **** card and it's a small provincial building society which might not get on with a US large company?
    The agent told me that "everything was OK with my booking". I was reassured. And wrong.

    CHAPTER FOUR: COMPUTER SAYS YES
    On the week of the 7th January, I checked on the website out of instinct and saw the reservation status was still "purchased". I'm quite busy with my day job that week and so I send a few emails around to AAdvantage, who tell me to contact reservations by phone. Quite useless you'd admit. So I ask my wife to call. Why? Because I'm busy -you were not paying attention. She can't get through to an agent but the robot tells her the reservation is OK, lists all the flights and so on. Hum. So it must be surely?

    CHAPTER FIVE: WHAT, NOTHING ON THE CREDIT CARD STATEMENT?
    I got the credit card statements, and to my surprise nothing on it. Strange I think. I quickly log in, see the reservation is still "purchased" and have to go travel on business for a few days. Upon my return, I login yesterday night and see my reservation as "cancelled." Mouth opens, closes, opens again, heartbeats skip. Expletive follows. I pick-up the phone yesterday night (on Sunday 9th February of what still is 2013 but now feels 1984) and get told that reservation can rebook it (sigh) but, ah, the price now jumps up by something obscene like 2,000 quids. Yep. Two thousand British Pounds. TWO GRAND. I don't find that funny, at all, and explain the agent (remaining calm, after all she's just a cog in the machine speaking in an 8 hour shift to just another customer) that I just want my booking back. In the meantime, I email back AAdvantage. She tells me she's got no record of my emails asking for clarification because it's another department, nor from my previous calls. Great.

    CHAPTER SIX: THE MORNING AFTER
    We're Monday 10th February. 10/2/13 as we say here. I'm supposed to do the school run but tell the kids to be ready and to wait on the stairs landing while I call back the UK call centre. The agent can't do anything but they tell me they've sent me some emails saying that my credit card has been declined. It's interesting because I never got them despite checking my spam etc. I ask her to forward that email. The girls have now been waiting 40 minutes in the hall and we're getting late for school.

    I hang up and glance at my email. The email I never received has been pasted into a new email but without the headers, so there's no mention of when it was really sent.

    During the day I kick up a fuss on twitter, which comes to the same conclusion: although they own the planes and all, AA can't rebook me at the original price.

    WHERE NOW?
    Now, what's funny about you AA is that you seem to record the things you like. Or those that fit your version of the truth. Like the call in chapter 3 wasn't logged into your CRM system, maybe because the agent just peeked at the record but did not modify it. Or that emails suddenly pops in, no probs at all, except when they're supposed to (I never got your emails stating the CC transaction did not go through).
    Because I actually don't believe you've tried to contact me about this booking. What I know for sure is that I've enquired many times about this booking. American Airlines, you did bad and need to apologise and own up to it. I want my booking back.

    In addition to screwing up my booking, your "customer experience" is pretty poor too. As a customer, I don't want to be passed around between department who are are passing on the baby. I. Don't. Care. Which. Department. You're all American Airlines for what I know. And. Pon't. Put. Me. On. Hold. All. The. Time. It's especially annoying as you're speaking to folks who don't seem to have a last name, which means that when the line cuts -as it did several times during that whole story- you have to start all over again.

    See, it's our holidays of a lifetime. A special treat for the girls. And I'd like to have it back. Please.

    Cheers,

    ****

    12/2/13 Update: go an inate response from customer relations telling me to call reservations.  Clearly, they get neither customer nor relations. In the meantime, here's a link to this post on the AA Facebook page. Please "like" and "share".
    On twitter, AA told me they could not help except rebooking me at the grossly inflated price. The story continues.
    And tonight, I've called back my credit card company who assured me they did not decline any transactions. Someone's telling porkies, and given AA's track record at communicating and inventing emails, I know where my suspicions lie.

    Wednesday, January 09, 2013

    Response from TfL re. Barclays Cycle Hire update PRICE DOUBLING

    Hi,

    It's all well and good except for regular users who I suspect make most of your revenues?

    For instance, this morning there wasn't 2x more bikes at the Waterloo
    docking stations.

    Cheers,

    LW>

    On 31/12/2012, BarclaysCycleHire barclayscyclehire@tfl.gov.uk wrote:
    > Dear Mr Windsor
    >
    >Thank you for your email regarding the tariff changes for Barclays Cycle
    >Hire in 2013.
    >
    >The scheme is regularly monitored and continually reviewed to identify any
    >opportunities for improving users' experience.
    >
    >We are undertaking important system software upgrades and website
    >improvements in 2013 to meet this goal. These include, for example:
    >
    >Enabling casual users to hire cycles with a single swipe of their payment
    >card. This will greatly simplify (and thereby speed up) the process of
    >hiring a bike on street
    >
    >Members will be able to hire bikes as casual users using their registered
    >payment card. This will benefit members who may have forgotten to bring
    >their key or who would like to casually hire cycles for friends and family
    >to accompany them
    >
    >Changes to the BCH website to improve the user experience, including
    >enhanced docking station status information, online account management and
    >an improved BCH journey planner.
    >
    >The on-street experience will also be improved through a number of changes
    >at docking stations, including:
    >
    >Enhancements to the terminal touch screen interface to provide better
    >information about nearby docking stations and improved foreign-language
    >information about using the scheme, as well as enabling the single-swipe
    >payment process noted above
    >
    >Improvements and updates to the terminal panels themselves, with new and
    >updated maps, nearest docking station information, and clearer information
    >about tariffs and charges
    >
    >We will continue to focus on improved bike redistribution and cycle repair
    >strategies to ensure that bikes and free docking points are as available to
    >users as possible, and that cycles with reported faults are repaired swiftly
    >and returned to the scheme. Ongoing maintenance of docking stations will
    >also continue to be a priority.
    >In addition to these system-wide improvements, the planning and roll-out of
    >the Cycle Hire Expansion and Intensification (CHEI) programme into south
    >west London is another key focus for us in the coming months. The Mayor has
    >always viewed cycle hire as an expanding programme and has asked TfL to look
    >at ways to expand and improve the scheme in a sustainable way into the
    >future.
    >
    >Additional revenue generated from the increase in the tariff will be put
    >towards the above developments as well as other improvement opportunities
    >that may arise, and we are confident that the scheme will continue to grow
    >and develop.
    >
    >Barclays Cycle Hire has been a fantastic success, introducing millions of
    >people to the joys of cycling in the capital. Indeed we saw record highs of
    >over 47,000 hires in one day, and 3 months of over a million hires during
    >the summer.
    >
    >Kind regards
    >
    >Tristan John
    >Barclays Cycle Hire

    Thursday, December 20, 2012

    To TfL re. Barclays Cycle Hire update PRICE DOUBLING

    Hello,

    I would like to know what the rationale is behind DOUBLING those fares and what plans you have to improve your service levels?

    Cheers,

    LW>
    From: Transport for London <Transport_for_London@info.tfl.gov.uk>
    Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 10:42 AM
    Subject: Barclays Cycle Hire update


    TFL - Service Changes
    If you are having problems viewing this email, you can view a mobile version or an online version. To ensure our email updates are delivered to your inbox, please add Transport_for_London@info.tfl.gov.uk to your email address book.
    Barclays Cycle Hire tfl.gov.uk
    Home
    Live travel news
    Getting around
    Road users
    Dear Mr Leforestier,

    We recently announced that the tariff for Barclays Cycle Hire is changing from Wednesday 2 January 2013:
    • 24 hour access will increase from £1 to £2
    • Weekly access will increase from £5 to £10
    • Annual membership will increase from £45 to £90
    After hiring a bike, the first thirty minutes of use will still be free. All other usage charges and additional charges including late return, non return and bicycle damage will not change.

    As you have Auto Renew set up on your account, you will automatically be charged the new access fee when you next hire a bike on or after 2 January. Access periods purchased before 2 January are unaffected, even if they run beyond this date.

    If you have multiple keys on your account, the same access fee will be charged for each key.

    The access fee increases are the first since the scheme was introduced and will be used to make improvements to the future operation of the scheme. Visit our website to read about our expansion plans.

    To find out more about the tariff changes, please click here


    Yours sincerely,

    Nick Aldworth
    General Manager, Barclays Cycle Hire
    Transport for London
    TweetShare
    These are our customer service updates about Barclays Cycle Hire.
    To unsubscribe, please click here
    Mayor of London - Transport for London
    Travel News
    How services are running and planned weekend works
    Journey Planner
    Get public transport, walking and cycling routes
    Maps
    Plan ahead with maps
    for Tube, Bus, DLR and more
    Follow us
    Get live service updates and the latest traffic news at tfl.gov.uk/socialmedia
    Copyright in the contents of this email and its attachments belongs to Transport for London.
    Any unauthorised usage will infringe that copyright. © Transport for London


    Friday, December 07, 2012

    Richmond pubs: the blog!

    Some reading for the winter month, with this blog that reviews all Richmond pubs:
    http://richmondpubguide.blogspot.co.uk/

    Good reading, all the miss is the pub address and the name of the beers.

    Monday, October 08, 2012

    IKEA, flat packed house fires?


    Melting transformer under the stairs, house fire narrowly avoided...

    Thank you not #IKEA.

    Wondering if that's a common occurence and a known fire hazard?

    Ikea item reference S0303(SANSA)
    Made in China by Tongxiang Yongda Telecomunications Co., Ltd under model YD-60A-2


    Update 15/10/12
    • Ikea called me yesterday (Sunday) to address the issue.
    • A very nice lady asked me details as they were concerned by the fire risk
    • The product appears discontinued so they can't withdraw it from sale
    • She will send a £20 voucher to use in store
    Bottom line: a late but very good reaction from IKEA, addressing both the safety aspect and the customer satisfaction aspects.

    Friday, October 05, 2012

    The catholic school issue

    It's not hard to get lost in the Great School Debate that's filling in the RTT front page and letters column, let alone several Facebook groups -and even this blog: On the LBRUT's catholic obsession.

    In the latest amazing twist, the council issued a press release with a very personal and combative langage against the opposition figurehead, Jeremy Rodell: Secretary of State for Education confirms Council decision on Catholic Schools is lawful - London Borough of Richmond upon Thames.
    Not quite what you'd expect from a lord...

    What's the issue then?
    In a nutshell, the council is spending £8.5 millions to buy a site for a catholic school, to be run by the Diocese of Westminster (with a dotted line to the pope in Rome then). The admission policy means that with 10% of catholics in the borough, over 70% of pupils will be from outside. The council argued that there's no NEED for secondary schools, and that therefore I'd be nice to have a catholic school, as there are primary catholic schools but the secondary ones had long been closed.

    Maybe I'm being naive, but I view this as simple supply and demand question. If there were more good grammar schools, surely parents would put their children in state schools instead of going private?


    Wednesday, September 26, 2012

    Richmond park given a rebuke on parties

    The park is a very special place indeed, but it seems not everyone is in agreement on what that means.

    The Friends of Richmond Park like it quiet. Very quiet. This time, they were not ranting about cyclists but had a gripe about a party held by Range Rover at the Royal Lower Ballet school. I actually quite agree this was way over the top we should leave deers and runners alone in the dark...  Good that they got their way. Mind you, they hold late night weddings at Pembroke Lodge -the extension disfigured it it to increase the capacity, not something the Friends care about apparently?

    Royal Ballet School Range Rover Launch - YouTube

    Thursday, September 20, 2012

    On the LBRUT's catholic obsession

    There's been much coverage about the London Borough of Richmond plan to open a catholic secondary school.  It would be all well IF there was not a shortage of secondary school places in the borough, IF the council was not spending £8m to buy the site and hand it free to the diocese and IF catholics did not make just 10% of the borough's population.

    Why this plan then? See my comment on Twickerati: Lord disappointed by acolyte
    The council spending £8m to create a faith-school that will provide endoctrinationquality education for catholic pupils, 70% coming OUT of the borough.

    Where's the democracy in there?

    By the way, why did Lord True not disclose his interests (see above, his wife is catholic and heads up the SIR HAROLD HOOD'S CHARITABLE TRUST, whose aim is quite vaguely "To benefit such Roman Catholic Charitable purposes as the Trustees shall in their absolute discretion from time to time think fit".
    This trust has £30m in the bank...

    See also:




    Monday, September 17, 2012

    How often do plane stowaways fall from the sky?

    Wheel well attemptsThe Beeb wakes up after under-reporting past cases with this article: BBC News - How often do plane stowaways fall from the sky? Interestingly enough, they don't answer the question.  I've done the maths though: it's one every four years. Just on Richmond borough.
    List of reported stowaways reported on Heathrow-bound planes
    Year Provenance Airline Number Condition Impact/Retrival Source
    2010 Austria Dubai royal family private jet 1 Alive LHR link
    1996 India 2 Dead Sainsbury's building site? link
    2012 South Africa BA 1 Dead LHR link
    2001 Bahrein BA 1 Dead Homebase car park, Richmond link
    2012 1 Dead Portman avenue, East Sheen link
    2002 Ghana Ghana Airways 2 Dead LHR link
    2002 Ghana BA Dead link
    2000 1 Dead Broadstone farm, Rudwick, Sussex? link
    2002 Uganda DAS Air Cargo 1 Dead LHR link
    2007 LHR
    See my previous post on the subject:

    Monday, September 10, 2012

    Stowaway death is a chilling reminder that the Heathrow runways point directly over London and 2 millions Londoners

    A stowaway fell on a Sheen road on Sunday:
    UPDATE: 'I heard a monstrous bang', says woman after body found in street (From Richmond and Twickenham Times)

    In 2001, a man fell from a British Airways Boeing 777 which was heading towards Heathrow and landed in a Homebase car park in Richmond.

    Heathrow is in the wrong place, it's only a question of time before someone (or worse, a plane) falls on a house:
    http://richmondtransits.blogspot.co.uk/2009/09/heathrow-is-not-safe-chilling-crash-map.html

    Friday, September 07, 2012

    How to milk a captive market? Tap commuters

    Rail commuters probably wonder what made them look so much like the golden eggs goose when reading pieces such as this one:
    Rail fare rises: UK commuter train tickets 10 times the price of European equivalents | This is Money

    Aren't they "carbon friendly" and part of the essential workforce of the nation after all?
    The truth is that subsidy levels are decreasing, which means a commuter in the UK will pay about 70% of the costs -at least that's a stated government goal.

    The problem though, is that years of under-investment and also deregulations have made this essential service costly to run.

    If only the service was ten times better than on the continent...


    Wednesday, July 25, 2012

    Another accident at North Sheen level crossing

    Another proof that a level crossing has no place in a dense urban setting.

    A vehicle smashed a barrier at the level crossing on Manor road. The barrier was lying on the pavement tonight (on the right on the picture) and all traffic was interrupted -including for pedestrians as there's no footbridge to the South side of Manor road (see posts below).

    At the time of writing, three police patrol cars and a Network Rail engineer were on site.

    This is the second incident in a week, as I saw the police at the same place on Monday apparently carrying checks for motorists running through the crossing lights...

    See my previous posts on the subject:

    Monday, July 02, 2012

    Cyclist fatalities increase in London -I squarely blame TfL for not providing adequate infrastructure

    Cyclists in the City just came up with this Boris-seeking missile:  Outrageous: 33% more pedestrians killed, 60% more cyclists killed and 21% more cyclists seriously injured. Boris Johnson - your traffic smoothing policy is killing people.

    Personally, I'm not sure Boris or Ken made much improvements -or to put it correctly, they slowly gave in to pressure but both failed to redesign the city to put bikes first. Because you see, this is what the Dutch have done, something that even the LCC don't really recognise.

    In essence, the infrastructure is still grossly inadequate -something I've blogged about previously. In a nutshell, I think TfL has absolutely no idea whatsoever on what a "cycle track" is. I don't think any of their engineers actually cycles. Can't be. Or that would be an all time height for ineptitude.

    And those sad numbers? As far as I am concerned, the fact there's been a huge increase in cycling can not play a contributing factor. Many of those cyclists are not that proficient either, nor are the drivers.

    Related posts:



    Tuesday, May 29, 2012

    Works in Waterloo: an improvement or just a cash making scheme?

    The Evening standard continues with their objective questionable journalistic, er, standards and regurgitates yet another press pack, this time from Network Rail for a change:
    Waterloo station turns trendy as Carluccio's, Corney and Barrow, and Thomas Pink open up on new concourse - Transport - News - Evening Standard

    Just to put things in perspective:
    1. On congestion, Network Rail have made it worse by making the underground concourses longer and shut outside of peak hours

    2. The Eurostar platform has been mothballed for the last 5 year... with four EMPTY platforms -quite a disgrace.

    3. Finally, are they going to pull down that hideous screen/wall between the concourse and the plaforms? There's no reason Waterloo can't be as beautiful as the Gare du Nord in Paris.

    To me it seems the only goal of this revamp is to provide more retail space, in other words it's a cash generating scheme that adds no benefits to the commuters.


    Previous posts on Water-loo station: 

    Wednesday, May 16, 2012

    Lobbies and lazy journalism

    Crisis: Queues at Heathrow Terminal 5 today
    Here's a great example of lobbies taking over column inches, in this case on a subject that's close to my heart:
    David Cameron told: Act now to save Heathrow Airport - Transport - News - Evening Standard

    Prime example of lazy "journalism", writing up a quick piece straight off the press pack from BAA. Any proper newspaper article would have tried to show both sides of the story, with counterpoints.

    I hope Jonathan and Lucy enjoyed a really nice lunch paid for by Ferrovial (BAA's Spanish owner) and a few nice gifts too.

    Just a reminder to set the record straight, London has FIVE international airport (actually, now SEVEN if you count Manston and Southend), totalling seven runways (not including the unused backup one at Gatwick), most being under-used. Heathrow is a WWII planning mistake, its flight path goes over 2m people. Those five airports handle over 130 millions passengers on their six runways, about 150% of the traffic in Paris (LHR + CDG).

    It's about time we stop comparing LHR to other European cities and instead do what they've done: build a new airport with enough room for expansion. If it needs to be in the Thames estuary, so be it. 

    Previous posts on the same subject: