Showing posts with label footbridge. Show all posts
Showing posts with label footbridge. Show all posts

Friday, May 12, 2017

Another near-fatality at North Sheen level crossing


Here's a candidate for the Darwin Awards.



Unfortunately, this level crossing is a known problem.


1. There's a long list of near misses, broken barriers, suicides or accidental deaths at this crossing, in Mortlake, in White Hart lane and Vine road -4 level crossings in about a couple miles or so.

2. There was a footbridge and Network Rail took it down in the 90ies, it was then reinstated a few years ago -but on the wrong side of the road (meaning if you're coming from the South side, you'd need to go up and down 4 times to get to the station, without ramps for prams or buggies and w/o side railings to take bikes up.

3. We live in a dense urban area, level crossings should not be. Period. 
Not only it's dangerous, but you can wait 15mn to cross. There are often huge queues along Manor Road, all the way back to Upper Richmond road on the South side and to Manor circus (A316) on the North side. Things are about to get much worse if the Stag Brewery in Mortlake gets redeveloped with 900 flats...

To your questions, I don't know who the chap is (no one seems to know him around here). He's certainly nearly won the Darwin Awards.

Including why it's an issue for emergency services, past accidents, etc.

Thursday, March 14, 2013

North Sheen station closed because of suspected WWII bomb

@ZeLondonNiouves Ambulance stuck at the Manor road level crossing: hope it's not too urgent... #fail pic.twitter.com/8geeTcvmbb
Following the decision of the lunatics running the council and Network rail of building a footbridge on the wrong side of Manor Road instead of where it happily was before, workmen have found a suspicious device.

Well done all.

JourneyCheck - South West Trains - All Stations to All Stations - Live Train Disruption/Cancellations/Delays and Real Time Departure/Arrival Boards
Line problem: at North Sheen.
Owing to a security alert at North Sheen all lines are blocked.
Impact:
Train services running through this station may be cancelled, delayed or revised at short notice. An estimate for the resumption of normal services will be provided as soon as the problem has been fully assessed.
Customer Advice:
A suspicious device has been found at North Sheen level crossing. Staff are on site and investigating, but until such time as the area can be declared safe, we are unable to run trains between Barnes and Feltham via Richmond.
Local bus services are conveying passengers via any reasonable route until further notice.
Underground services are conveying passengers between Richmond and London Waterloo in both directions until further notice.
Message Received :14/03/2013 13:15


See also:


Wednesday, July 25, 2012

Another accident at North Sheen level crossing

Another proof that a level crossing has no place in a dense urban setting.

A vehicle smashed a barrier at the level crossing on Manor road. The barrier was lying on the pavement tonight (on the right on the picture) and all traffic was interrupted -including for pedestrians as there's no footbridge to the South side of Manor road (see posts below).

At the time of writing, three police patrol cars and a Network Rail engineer were on site.

This is the second incident in a week, as I saw the police at the same place on Monday apparently carrying checks for motorists running through the crossing lights...

See my previous posts on the subject:

Friday, April 27, 2012

North Sheen Footbridge update

Local politicians are busy visiting us before next week's elections, including the chap who's designed a new version. They seem to be all quite happy about finally getting a resolution, thought they quickly admit it's only a fix to part of the issue.

I'm not sure why they think we should settle for something half-baked?

Here's my comment on Zac Goldsmith's website, since Katharine Harborne doesn't seem to believe in getting direct feedback on hers.

We should not let Network Rail get away with this band-aid solution as it solves only a part of the problem.

1. It doesn't solve the car congestion issue. A level crossing simply has no place in a densely populated area in 2012.

2. It doesn't help with the station access for less able and parents with children. Or commuters living on the South of the railway line.

3. It doesn't improve the miserable station that North Sheen is, with for instance cycle parking.

Bottom line: Network Rail broke it 17 years ago, they should fix it by moving the signalling equipment they installed where the old footpath was.

See my previous posts on the subject:



Wednesday, February 09, 2011

Curing the symptoms: plod in a van at the level crossing

After realising red  light jumping at levels crossing is rife and having established that people running in front of trains isn't exactly the best for health and safety statistics, Network Rail has shelled out £60k on a high-tech camera van. 
The sixty grand mobile enforcement control room comes complete with PC Chris Sheppard watching herds of commuters and vehicules running across the railway as light flashes.

Check this video, mostly filmed at Mortlake station (the van is parked on a double yellow line..): BBC: New spy camera to check level crossings.

It's worth pointing out that the Sheen lane crossing does have a pedestrian bridge, allowing school children to cross instead of running across unlike at North Sheen station.

My take on this? Once more, they're trying to cure the symptoms rather than tackling the issue. Which is quite simply that a level crossing on a busy line (translate: closed for 15+ mn at a time) is archaic in a densely populated connurbation. The line should be buried or a tunnel dig, or else. 
 
Final thought: the story doesn't say if the plod-van comes with a toilet?

Monday, October 11, 2010

North Sheen level crossing: don't miss the public meeting on the 21st

As posted todat on the Facebook group: Stuck at North Sheen Level Crossing, there will be a public meeting about the level crossing with Zac Goldsmith, Network Rail and local councillors at DUKE STREET CHURCH in DUKE STREET, RICHMOND on THURSDAY 21st OCTOBER at 7.30pm. Bring your tales of misery and woe!

See my previous posts on the level crossings:


  • Near miss at North Sheen level crossing




  • Some news on the level crossing: consultation next Thursday!



  • At last: the North Sheen footbridge is coming... alas, this is not what you expected!



  • Richmond Transits: Join the Facebook group "Stuck at North Sheen



  • Richmond Transits: Airtrack and North Sheen Crossing


  • Richmond Transits: Monday Mayhem at North Sheen level crossing




  • Richmond Transits: Update on the North Sheen station footbridge




  • Richmond Transits: Here's the new camera at North Sheen level crossing




  • Richmond Transits: Update on the update on the North Sheen station




  • Richmond Transits: Susan Kramer's progress on North Sheen Station





  • Richmond Transits: Another train tragedy in waiting at North





  • Richmond Transits: Still waiting at the level crossing...





  • Traffic pandemonium: just a sign of things to come?




  • More on Manor road and Heathrow



  • Richmond Transits: Level crossing tragedy in Barnes



  • Richmond Transits: Update on the North Sheen station footbridge



  • Richmond Transits: Preliminary plans for North Sheen footbridge rebuffed




  • Richmond Transits: Campaing for suppressing level crossings




  • Richmond Transits: Richmond and Twickenham Times: Commuters see red over level crossing




  • Richmond Transits: Susan Kramer's progress on North Sheen Station footbridge




  • Richmond Transits: Time to remind Susan Kramer about the North Sheen Station footbridge



  • Recommended reading:

    Tags:, , , , , , , , , ,

    Friday, October 08, 2010

    Near miss at North Sheen level crossing

    On Wednesday, a mother on a bicycle with a child on the back and another on a bike attempted to cross while the lights were flashing.


    They got trapped by the barriers and had to be helped out to safety by some bystanders who held the barriers.

    There is no emergency phone or "panic button" at the crossing.

    Such a crossing in a dense urban area is an accident waiting to happen. What will it take for action to be taken?

    See my previous posts on the level crossings:

    Monday, June 21, 2010

    Some news on the level crossing: consultation next Thursday!

    The council just informed me that a public meeting will be held on the Manor Road level crossing, following that very ill advised planning application for a footbridge.


    In my previous post (At last: the North Sheen footbridge is coming... alas, this is not what you expected!) I explained that indeed someone came up with the ridiculous idea to set the footbridge across the street, opposite the station.

    See the invite below -do come to voice your ideas!

    (still no word from Susan Kramer on this...)


    *** EMAIL FROM THE COUNCIL ***

    Proposal:

    Erection of a footbridge to facilitate a pedestrian crossing of the railway and installation of 1 no. CCTV mast with 2 no. Cameras.

    Town and Country Planning Act 1990

    Town and Country (General Development Procedure) Order 1995

    I write to advise you that the above application is to be considered by the Planning Committee on 1 July 2010. The meeting will commence at 6.30pm and be held in the Council Offices, York House, Richmond Road, Twickenham. The meeting is held in public and the Council has a procedure for representations to be made by members of the public and applicants to be made to the Committee: this is explained on the attached sheet. Please note that speakers should arrive at 6pm to liaise with the committee clerk.

    If you would like to put your views to the Committee personally please contact the Customer Support Centre at the Civic Centre, 44 York Street, Twickenham on 0845 612 2660 so that we can register your wish to speak. You will be given a registration number which you may be asked to quote to the Committee Clerk when you arrive at York House for the meeting. If you do not register your wish to speak before 12 noon on the day before the meeting you will not be allowed to speak. The written comments you have already submitted have been included in my officer's report. Any further written comments will be accepted until noon on the day before.

    Copies of the Committee Agenda and my officer's report will be available for inspection in Richmond's reference library five working days before the meeting and on the Council's website at www.richmond.gov.uk/planning. If you go to your local library to see the report on the website, it will greatly assist if you take this letter with you.

    We have produced a short film to show first time speakers how the Planning Committee conducts its proceedings. The film is available in three formats, DVD, CD-Rom and VHS. Please ask for a copy in your chosen format when registering to speak. The film can also be viewed on our website.

    Yours faithfully

    Robert Angus

    Development Control Manager


    See my previous posts on the level crossings:

    Monday, April 26, 2010

    At last: the North Sheen footbridge is coming... alas, this is not what you expected!

    The planning application for the footbridge over the infamous Manor road level crossing has been filed here.

    Before your rejoice, I must add that it's not exacly what you were looking for...
    Indeed, as you can see from the picture on the left, the engineers have sited it on the wrong side -not where the existing footbridge is, but on the Richmond side.

    Which means anyone coming from the South (Upper Richmond road/Sheen road) would have to take one footbridge across, cross Manor road and then the other footbridge to get to the station.

    What kind of weird logic was in that engineer's mind?

    Also, as John pointed out on the Facebook group Stuck at North Sheen level crossing -it doesn't solve the misery for car users. Not surprising, as this aspect is not taken into account by the "Design & access statement" (who came up with such a document title?):
    In the mid 1990's the southern span of North Sheen station footbridge was removed leaving access to the station from the north side of the level crossing on Manor Road only. The barriers of the level crossing are closed for approximately 30 minutes in each hour and this has led to dangerous misuse through people twng to access the crossing whilst the barriers are lowered. A safer system of crossing the railway lines when the barriers are down is required. The
    introduction of the footbridge will remedy the safety problem at this location.
    Partial analysis, partial solution: the planning application is flawed because they only saw the issue with crossing, not the cars, not the stations access, nor there is any provision for cycle parking, people with pushchairs and cycles or disabled access.

    The Conservative candidate, surely seeing an opportunity to throw a spanner in one of Susan Kramer's campaings commented:
    I whole heartedly support the proposal for replacing this footbridge that was dismantled years ago leaving a ridiculous half bridge for the last 16 years. The proposed bridge will help commuters accessing the North Sheen Station.

    However the current proposal will do little to make life easer for other members of the community, mothers with young children and pushchairs, those that have difficulty walking or climbing, cyclist and those with heavy shopping.

    To approve the current design without listening to the excellent suggestions of the local community is a wasted opportunity to build better bridge that will serve the needs of more people in our community. After waiting 16 years for this bridge our community deserves a far better bridge.
    Can I urge that the decision on this application go to a full planning committee for approval as soon as possible to avoid any further delay but to allow consideration of local resident?s suggestions for better design, better location and better accessibility, thus making the bridge more of an asset to the whole community and less of an eyesore?

    It is a wasted opportunity not to consider the residents suggestions to improve the design ensuring it meets the councils own guidelines BLT 17 on designing out crime and fear of crime.

    It is a wasted opportunity not to consider the residents suggestions to improve the design of the bridge BLT 11.

    It is a wasted opportunity to not consider the residents suggestions on the location of the bridge to avoid the bridge overlooking residents properties.

    Best wishes

    Katharine Robinson
    Conservative Council Candidate for North Richmond
    Conservatives Caring and Campaigning for our Community.

    A political attack from someone we haven't heard much on this issue but I would find hard to agree with her points.

    Susan, what's next?

    See my previous posts on the level crossings:

    Friday, April 23, 2010

    Here's the new camera at North Sheen level crossing

    But no sign of a footbridge yet :-(

    Is that camera for cars jumping the lights in a bid to avoid being stuck for 20 mn? Does it work for schoolchildren too???

    Monday, March 15, 2010

    Join the Facebook group "Stuck at North Sheen level crossing"

    Just join:
    Facebook | Stuck at North Sheen Level Crossing
    See my previous posts on the level crossings and the footbridge...

    Do also check this BBC News footage, partly filmed at North Sheen:
    As far as I am concerned, it's all too easy for Network Rail to accuse people to be careless when a level crossing is down for up to 15 mn at the time and is located in a densely populated area.

    North Sheen level crossing belongs to a long bygone area and the line should be running in a covered trench at this place, leaving space for a commuters bicycle park and a more modern station for instance.



    , , , , , , ,

    Friday, March 12, 2010

    Still waiting at the level crossing...

    At the North Sheen station / Manor road this morning.

    I'm not sure I understand the ambulance crew logic: if it's urgent, why go through a level crossing? If it's not, why the flashing lights?

    Anyhow, just another life level crossings cost lives (and a reminder we're waiting for that footbridge promised by Susan Kramer MP)

    See my previous posts on the level crossings.

    Friday, August 28, 2009

    Traffic pandemonium: just a sign of things to come?

    Thanks to Thames Water who shut the Northbound Clifford avenue section to replace aging water mains the A205 South Circular in Richmond (This Is Local London), combined with Transport For London who revamped Richmond Circus to add more car lanes but still no cycle lanes (I'll post again on this) plus some more water mains replacement in White Hart Lane, Richmond was totally grid locked this summer.

    Great planning guys....

    One of the fundamental issues is that our borough has the plight of being sectionned by a train line with only a few crossings: a bridge on the Quadrant, another one in Church lane, a level crossing in Manor Road, a bridge on Clifford avenue and then some more level crossings in Sheen Road by Mortlake train station, White Hart Lane in East Sheen/Mortlake, Vine Road in Barnes. There are then only three bridges before Putney, including on Dryburgh road -which is closed during rush hours...

    IFlowers placed by level crossing gates at Elsenham Station in Essex where Charlie Thompson and her friend Olivia Bazlinton died.'ve been lobbying long to get a footbridge in North Sheen and believe level crossings are a problem in general, I'm not the only one it seems according to this BBC article:

    More people die on level crossings than in derailments or train crashes, killing on average one person a month.

    Network Rail says that every year 2,000 people are reported to misuse level crossings with motorists ignoring warning lights or weaving round barriers.

    The National Union of Rail, Maritime, and Transport Workers Union (RMT) says that even crossings with barriers and warning systems are unsafe and should be replaced with bridges or underpasses over a period of ten years.

    The bad news is that it's only going to get worse for local residents, with longer wait at crossings if BAA gets their way.

    Yes, BAA, the London Heathrow airport operator who's wanting to put more planes overhead. Because they just figured out that Heathrow is poorly deserved by trains. No, not really, the truth is that they are trying to curb on car mouvements around the aiport in order to land more planes without breaching too much the European directive on air quality (thank god for the EU). Insane? Yes, but these are the facts.

    So, if Airtrack goes ahead the trains frequency will double -from 8 to 16- with no or little benefits for local residents as it's far from certain the extra trains will stop in North Sheen for instance, while Manor Road will be continuously clogged with a traffic jam caused by the level crossing barriers being shut for 45 minutes in one hour!

    This is obviously not acceptable, and this train line should be buried under street level from Putney to Richmond. Period.

    Our MP Susan Kramer is running a petition: http://www.susankramer.org.uk/pages/airtrack.html. The consultation closes on 18 September.

    Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

    Thursday, December 04, 2008

    More on Manor road and Heathrow

    Seems now the government is embarrassed:

    Decision on third runway delayed(BBC.co.uk)























    "Anti-Heathrow expansion campaigners claim the government is stalling"

    "A decision on whether a third runway
    should be built at Heathrow Airport has been put back to January 2009,
    the Department for Transport has said.
    "


    And also, the impact of the Airtrack on local level crossing is making into national news:




    BBC NEWS | England | London | Rail link 'may cause longer wait'


    Read also my previous post: Airtrack and North Sheen Crossing


    , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

    Monday, November 17, 2008

    Airtrack and North Sheen Crossing

    I picked up last week a flyer from the LibDems at North Sheen station, to read that at my great pleasure Susan Kramer has obtained that the footbridge to the South side of the track will be rebuilt.

    This is not only a practical issue, as with the new train schedules the level crossing in Manor road is down a a lot (read in the RTT: Level crossing bottlenecks choking Richmond, apparently it could be 75% of the time in the future!) it is also a safety issue. Indeed, I'm glad to get someone chiming in on something I've raised over two years ago:

    Assembly member Caroline Pidgeon discussed safety concerns to pedestrians brought about by the delays.She said: “People get so frustrated waiting for the barriers thatsome have been tempted to go round them and run across the tracks.“Children have been seen doing this and it’s just an accident waiting to happen.”

    It's also unfair for local residents: we get all the congestion but only four trains per hour at peak time. At least, we should get four trains per hour off-peak as well.

    (plus, let's fine stationary cars too: Stuck at a level crossing? Turn off the engine or pay £20 fine - The Times)

    What's the link with this and Airtrack, the plan to improve Heathrow's access by rail? At first sight, it looks like a good idea, and I am always supportive for better public transport.

    However, it's hard to read without being suspicious of BAA's intentions, here's my take:

    1. BAA and BA build a new terminal in Heathrow (despite massive local opposition, read on BBC.com: Heathrow runway debate a 'sham'), claiming it's vital for the economy (without supporting this with any proof) and despite London being served by 4 other airports...
    2. Oh, shoot, access to Heathrow by public transport isn't that good and, as opposed to what's going on the continent, there's no high-speed rail link.
    3. And, bugger, if they extend the airport, they won't meet the new EU emission criteria, even with BAA's imaginary green’ jumbo (The Times).
    4. Easy: they just improve the public transport and create a car-free zone around the airport.
    5. Expensive? Not really, they say let's just extend the existing train lines, charge more for parking and create a road tax on the model of Red Ken's London Congestion Charge.
    The snag? The train network, for not having received significant investments in the last 30 years, is completely saturated in the South East of England. And those trains to Heathrow, they will have to run somewhere. Like through Richmond...

    This is why I oppose Airtrack, unless they actually invest significantly to increase rail capacity: North Sheen should be buried underground, a car park created on top to encourage people to park and take the train and we should see 8 trains an hour.

    You can make your views heard on Thursday


    Read my other posts on the North Sheen footbridge and those on Heathrow Expansion.

    And also: MPs attack Airtrack (RTT)


    Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

    Monday, August 18, 2008

    Some news on those level crossings...

    I've blogged numerous times on the North Sheen station footbridge, because to my mind it's simply daft that we can't access the station from both sides of the level crossing.

    It's also quite dangerous, especially with all those kids crossing itevery day. And not accessible.

    And, since you can be stuck for over 12 minutes behind it, it's a traffic hog, especially when it breaks down.

    Read all my previous posts on the infamous North Sheen footbridge and level crossing.

    Apparently, it's not going to improve: in order to provide Heathrow with better train services (hello world, is this a planning mistake or is it deliberate to try curb car emissions so that planes can continue to pollute for free?) this level crossing (and Mortlake, Barnes...) could be down for up to 45 mn in one hour.

    Read on the article: MPs attack Airtrack.

    This is a joke, they might as well close it for good and let us gridlocked!

    PS: if you did not click on all the links above, do check this one: HEATHROW – ARETIREMENTPLAN by Town and Country Planning.

    Monday, June 02, 2008

    Tax, tax, tax -but still no rail infrastructures

    The government keeps on taxing automobilists but fails to invest in public transportation:

    Read in
    BBC NEWS | England | London | New station's opening postponed: "The station will be the first new suburban station built in south London since the Second World War, according to Merton Council."

    What a disgrace! Rail fares up, taxes on petrol up, local council tax up and interest rates up. The Richmond commuters feel the pinch on the wallet more than ever recently.

    In the meantime, kerosene is still not taxed and now Boris bailed off the massive demonstration against Heathrow -this doesn't detract the Beeb to pedal the BAA spin comparing Heathrow to other cites, conveniently forgetting that London has no less than FIVE international airports.

    All that could have been avoided if instead of perpetuating a 1950ies planning error the government had planned to build a new airport in the estuary as it has often been suggested -and close other airports such as Gatwick, City or Heathrow like it has been done in Berlin and other European cities.

    It seems that the government is very short sighted indeed when it comes to transportation.... It maybe why we still don't have a footbridge in North Sheen?




    Friday, February 08, 2008

    RTT on White Hart Lane level crossing

    The Richmond and Twickenham Times has just published an article on the White Hart Lane level crossing.

    Network Rail is "thinking about" a bridge (£25k, peanuts compared to the useless repaving of downtown Richmond) and Con. Trigg said "it's a difficult problem to solve". I think it;s quite simple in fact: here are the comments I've posted on their web site:

    I've blogged numerous times on the North Sheen crossing which is equally dangerous: only last week a vehicule came stuck in the barrier which caused traffic mayhem all around.

    The options offered are just lame: yes, a footbridge would be good, closing the crossing would just cripple the area.

    I've travelled a lot in Europe and never saw level crossing in urban areas: are they more clever?

    But the real solution would be to either bury the train line underground (expensive but the resulting free land overground could be part sold for profil and converted into commuters parking to incitate people to leave their car and travel green) or digging a road mini-tunnel.

    Seriously.

    Tags: , , , , , ,

    Tuesday, January 29, 2008

    Monday Mayhem at North Sheen level crossing

    The infamous North Sheen level crossing came once again to public attention on Monday morning. It was shut for most of the morning after someone drove into it (I don't have more details but it's what the PC guarding it told me). This meant major mayhem on the roads all around Richmond and Sheen....

    All interested parties in starting a campaign group for its removal contact me via the blog.

    Tuesday, November 20, 2007

    Disjointed (and not accessible)

    Posted some thoughts as comments on this Going Underground post:

    Wouldn't it great if the London transport network was more joined-up?

    Why are the two Edgware road stations not joined as one?
    Same question for the different Hammersmith station: why doesn't the Hammersmith & City line not going a bit further underground to join the District/Circle lines stations?)
    In Putney, why did they put tube and rail stations 150 m apart despite those two lines intersecting?

    What would it take to make this world-class (and maybe Olympic-class)?

    There would be immense benefits in commute time, as long changeovers can add 10-15 mn to a journey and are a major put off for people.

    Rethinking those stations would help commuters, much more than charging people for entering in the city by car -which no one in their right mind would do if they truly had the choice.

    Oh, and another thing would be to make the tube and trains more accessible. There are very few lifts in the tube, and I've been campaigning for quite a while to install a new footbridge in North Sheen. Of course it would be better to find ways to make the station accessible to wheelchairs (and buggies), especially since Richmond isn't either....



    Tags: , , , , , ,