Showing posts with label north. Show all posts
Showing posts with label north. Show all posts

Friday, May 12, 2017

Another near-fatality at North Sheen level crossing


Here's a candidate for the Darwin Awards.



Unfortunately, this level crossing is a known problem.


1. There's a long list of near misses, broken barriers, suicides or accidental deaths at this crossing, in Mortlake, in White Hart lane and Vine road -4 level crossings in about a couple miles or so.

2. There was a footbridge and Network Rail took it down in the 90ies, it was then reinstated a few years ago -but on the wrong side of the road (meaning if you're coming from the South side, you'd need to go up and down 4 times to get to the station, without ramps for prams or buggies and w/o side railings to take bikes up.

3. We live in a dense urban area, level crossings should not be. Period. 
Not only it's dangerous, but you can wait 15mn to cross. There are often huge queues along Manor Road, all the way back to Upper Richmond road on the South side and to Manor circus (A316) on the North side. Things are about to get much worse if the Stag Brewery in Mortlake gets redeveloped with 900 flats...

To your questions, I don't know who the chap is (no one seems to know him around here). He's certainly nearly won the Darwin Awards.

Including why it's an issue for emergency services, past accidents, etc.

Thursday, March 14, 2013

North Sheen station closed because of suspected WWII bomb

@ZeLondonNiouves Ambulance stuck at the Manor road level crossing: hope it's not too urgent... #fail pic.twitter.com/8geeTcvmbb
Following the decision of the lunatics running the council and Network rail of building a footbridge on the wrong side of Manor Road instead of where it happily was before, workmen have found a suspicious device.

Well done all.

JourneyCheck - South West Trains - All Stations to All Stations - Live Train Disruption/Cancellations/Delays and Real Time Departure/Arrival Boards
Line problem: at North Sheen.
Owing to a security alert at North Sheen all lines are blocked.
Impact:
Train services running through this station may be cancelled, delayed or revised at short notice. An estimate for the resumption of normal services will be provided as soon as the problem has been fully assessed.
Customer Advice:
A suspicious device has been found at North Sheen level crossing. Staff are on site and investigating, but until such time as the area can be declared safe, we are unable to run trains between Barnes and Feltham via Richmond.
Local bus services are conveying passengers via any reasonable route until further notice.
Underground services are conveying passengers between Richmond and London Waterloo in both directions until further notice.
Message Received :14/03/2013 13:15


See also:


Wednesday, July 25, 2012

Another accident at North Sheen level crossing

Another proof that a level crossing has no place in a dense urban setting.

A vehicle smashed a barrier at the level crossing on Manor road. The barrier was lying on the pavement tonight (on the right on the picture) and all traffic was interrupted -including for pedestrians as there's no footbridge to the South side of Manor road (see posts below).

At the time of writing, three police patrol cars and a Network Rail engineer were on site.

This is the second incident in a week, as I saw the police at the same place on Monday apparently carrying checks for motorists running through the crossing lights...

See my previous posts on the subject:

Friday, April 27, 2012

North Sheen Footbridge update

Local politicians are busy visiting us before next week's elections, including the chap who's designed a new version. They seem to be all quite happy about finally getting a resolution, thought they quickly admit it's only a fix to part of the issue.

I'm not sure why they think we should settle for something half-baked?

Here's my comment on Zac Goldsmith's website, since Katharine Harborne doesn't seem to believe in getting direct feedback on hers.

We should not let Network Rail get away with this band-aid solution as it solves only a part of the problem.

1. It doesn't solve the car congestion issue. A level crossing simply has no place in a densely populated area in 2012.

2. It doesn't help with the station access for less able and parents with children. Or commuters living on the South of the railway line.

3. It doesn't improve the miserable station that North Sheen is, with for instance cycle parking.

Bottom line: Network Rail broke it 17 years ago, they should fix it by moving the signalling equipment they installed where the old footpath was.

See my previous posts on the subject:



Wednesday, February 09, 2011

Curing the symptoms: plod in a van at the level crossing

After realising red  light jumping at levels crossing is rife and having established that people running in front of trains isn't exactly the best for health and safety statistics, Network Rail has shelled out £60k on a high-tech camera van. 
The sixty grand mobile enforcement control room comes complete with PC Chris Sheppard watching herds of commuters and vehicules running across the railway as light flashes.

Check this video, mostly filmed at Mortlake station (the van is parked on a double yellow line..): BBC: New spy camera to check level crossings.

It's worth pointing out that the Sheen lane crossing does have a pedestrian bridge, allowing school children to cross instead of running across unlike at North Sheen station.

My take on this? Once more, they're trying to cure the symptoms rather than tackling the issue. Which is quite simply that a level crossing on a busy line (translate: closed for 15+ mn at a time) is archaic in a densely populated connurbation. The line should be buried or a tunnel dig, or else. 
 
Final thought: the story doesn't say if the plod-van comes with a toilet?

Monday, October 11, 2010

North Sheen level crossing: don't miss the public meeting on the 21st

As posted todat on the Facebook group: Stuck at North Sheen Level Crossing, there will be a public meeting about the level crossing with Zac Goldsmith, Network Rail and local councillors at DUKE STREET CHURCH in DUKE STREET, RICHMOND on THURSDAY 21st OCTOBER at 7.30pm. Bring your tales of misery and woe!

See my previous posts on the level crossings:


  • Near miss at North Sheen level crossing




  • Some news on the level crossing: consultation next Thursday!



  • At last: the North Sheen footbridge is coming... alas, this is not what you expected!



  • Richmond Transits: Join the Facebook group "Stuck at North Sheen



  • Richmond Transits: Airtrack and North Sheen Crossing


  • Richmond Transits: Monday Mayhem at North Sheen level crossing




  • Richmond Transits: Update on the North Sheen station footbridge




  • Richmond Transits: Here's the new camera at North Sheen level crossing




  • Richmond Transits: Update on the update on the North Sheen station




  • Richmond Transits: Susan Kramer's progress on North Sheen Station





  • Richmond Transits: Another train tragedy in waiting at North





  • Richmond Transits: Still waiting at the level crossing...





  • Traffic pandemonium: just a sign of things to come?




  • More on Manor road and Heathrow



  • Richmond Transits: Level crossing tragedy in Barnes



  • Richmond Transits: Update on the North Sheen station footbridge



  • Richmond Transits: Preliminary plans for North Sheen footbridge rebuffed




  • Richmond Transits: Campaing for suppressing level crossings




  • Richmond Transits: Richmond and Twickenham Times: Commuters see red over level crossing




  • Richmond Transits: Susan Kramer's progress on North Sheen Station footbridge




  • Richmond Transits: Time to remind Susan Kramer about the North Sheen Station footbridge



  • Recommended reading:

    Tags:, , , , , , , , , ,

    Friday, October 08, 2010

    Near miss at North Sheen level crossing

    On Wednesday, a mother on a bicycle with a child on the back and another on a bike attempted to cross while the lights were flashing.


    They got trapped by the barriers and had to be helped out to safety by some bystanders who held the barriers.

    There is no emergency phone or "panic button" at the crossing.

    Such a crossing in a dense urban area is an accident waiting to happen. What will it take for action to be taken?

    See my previous posts on the level crossings:

    Monday, June 21, 2010

    Some news on the level crossing: consultation next Thursday!

    The council just informed me that a public meeting will be held on the Manor Road level crossing, following that very ill advised planning application for a footbridge.


    In my previous post (At last: the North Sheen footbridge is coming... alas, this is not what you expected!) I explained that indeed someone came up with the ridiculous idea to set the footbridge across the street, opposite the station.

    See the invite below -do come to voice your ideas!

    (still no word from Susan Kramer on this...)


    *** EMAIL FROM THE COUNCIL ***

    Proposal:

    Erection of a footbridge to facilitate a pedestrian crossing of the railway and installation of 1 no. CCTV mast with 2 no. Cameras.

    Town and Country Planning Act 1990

    Town and Country (General Development Procedure) Order 1995

    I write to advise you that the above application is to be considered by the Planning Committee on 1 July 2010. The meeting will commence at 6.30pm and be held in the Council Offices, York House, Richmond Road, Twickenham. The meeting is held in public and the Council has a procedure for representations to be made by members of the public and applicants to be made to the Committee: this is explained on the attached sheet. Please note that speakers should arrive at 6pm to liaise with the committee clerk.

    If you would like to put your views to the Committee personally please contact the Customer Support Centre at the Civic Centre, 44 York Street, Twickenham on 0845 612 2660 so that we can register your wish to speak. You will be given a registration number which you may be asked to quote to the Committee Clerk when you arrive at York House for the meeting. If you do not register your wish to speak before 12 noon on the day before the meeting you will not be allowed to speak. The written comments you have already submitted have been included in my officer's report. Any further written comments will be accepted until noon on the day before.

    Copies of the Committee Agenda and my officer's report will be available for inspection in Richmond's reference library five working days before the meeting and on the Council's website at www.richmond.gov.uk/planning. If you go to your local library to see the report on the website, it will greatly assist if you take this letter with you.

    We have produced a short film to show first time speakers how the Planning Committee conducts its proceedings. The film is available in three formats, DVD, CD-Rom and VHS. Please ask for a copy in your chosen format when registering to speak. The film can also be viewed on our website.

    Yours faithfully

    Robert Angus

    Development Control Manager


    See my previous posts on the level crossings:

    Monday, April 26, 2010

    At last: the North Sheen footbridge is coming... alas, this is not what you expected!

    The planning application for the footbridge over the infamous Manor road level crossing has been filed here.

    Before your rejoice, I must add that it's not exacly what you were looking for...
    Indeed, as you can see from the picture on the left, the engineers have sited it on the wrong side -not where the existing footbridge is, but on the Richmond side.

    Which means anyone coming from the South (Upper Richmond road/Sheen road) would have to take one footbridge across, cross Manor road and then the other footbridge to get to the station.

    What kind of weird logic was in that engineer's mind?

    Also, as John pointed out on the Facebook group Stuck at North Sheen level crossing -it doesn't solve the misery for car users. Not surprising, as this aspect is not taken into account by the "Design & access statement" (who came up with such a document title?):
    In the mid 1990's the southern span of North Sheen station footbridge was removed leaving access to the station from the north side of the level crossing on Manor Road only. The barriers of the level crossing are closed for approximately 30 minutes in each hour and this has led to dangerous misuse through people twng to access the crossing whilst the barriers are lowered. A safer system of crossing the railway lines when the barriers are down is required. The
    introduction of the footbridge will remedy the safety problem at this location.
    Partial analysis, partial solution: the planning application is flawed because they only saw the issue with crossing, not the cars, not the stations access, nor there is any provision for cycle parking, people with pushchairs and cycles or disabled access.

    The Conservative candidate, surely seeing an opportunity to throw a spanner in one of Susan Kramer's campaings commented:
    I whole heartedly support the proposal for replacing this footbridge that was dismantled years ago leaving a ridiculous half bridge for the last 16 years. The proposed bridge will help commuters accessing the North Sheen Station.

    However the current proposal will do little to make life easer for other members of the community, mothers with young children and pushchairs, those that have difficulty walking or climbing, cyclist and those with heavy shopping.

    To approve the current design without listening to the excellent suggestions of the local community is a wasted opportunity to build better bridge that will serve the needs of more people in our community. After waiting 16 years for this bridge our community deserves a far better bridge.
    Can I urge that the decision on this application go to a full planning committee for approval as soon as possible to avoid any further delay but to allow consideration of local resident?s suggestions for better design, better location and better accessibility, thus making the bridge more of an asset to the whole community and less of an eyesore?

    It is a wasted opportunity not to consider the residents suggestions to improve the design ensuring it meets the councils own guidelines BLT 17 on designing out crime and fear of crime.

    It is a wasted opportunity not to consider the residents suggestions to improve the design of the bridge BLT 11.

    It is a wasted opportunity to not consider the residents suggestions on the location of the bridge to avoid the bridge overlooking residents properties.

    Best wishes

    Katharine Robinson
    Conservative Council Candidate for North Richmond
    Conservatives Caring and Campaigning for our Community.

    A political attack from someone we haven't heard much on this issue but I would find hard to agree with her points.

    Susan, what's next?

    See my previous posts on the level crossings:

    Friday, April 23, 2010

    Here's the new camera at North Sheen level crossing

    But no sign of a footbridge yet :-(

    Is that camera for cars jumping the lights in a bid to avoid being stuck for 20 mn? Does it work for schoolchildren too???

    Monday, March 15, 2010

    Join the Facebook group "Stuck at North Sheen level crossing"

    Just join:
    Facebook | Stuck at North Sheen Level Crossing
    See my previous posts on the level crossings and the footbridge...

    Do also check this BBC News footage, partly filmed at North Sheen:
    As far as I am concerned, it's all too easy for Network Rail to accuse people to be careless when a level crossing is down for up to 15 mn at the time and is located in a densely populated area.

    North Sheen level crossing belongs to a long bygone area and the line should be running in a covered trench at this place, leaving space for a commuters bicycle park and a more modern station for instance.



    , , , , , , ,

    Friday, March 12, 2010

    Still waiting at the level crossing...

    At the North Sheen station / Manor road this morning.

    I'm not sure I understand the ambulance crew logic: if it's urgent, why go through a level crossing? If it's not, why the flashing lights?

    Anyhow, just another life level crossings cost lives (and a reminder we're waiting for that footbridge promised by Susan Kramer MP)

    See my previous posts on the level crossings.

    Monday, August 18, 2008

    Some news on those level crossings...

    I've blogged numerous times on the North Sheen station footbridge, because to my mind it's simply daft that we can't access the station from both sides of the level crossing.

    It's also quite dangerous, especially with all those kids crossing itevery day. And not accessible.

    And, since you can be stuck for over 12 minutes behind it, it's a traffic hog, especially when it breaks down.

    Read all my previous posts on the infamous North Sheen footbridge and level crossing.

    Apparently, it's not going to improve: in order to provide Heathrow with better train services (hello world, is this a planning mistake or is it deliberate to try curb car emissions so that planes can continue to pollute for free?) this level crossing (and Mortlake, Barnes...) could be down for up to 45 mn in one hour.

    Read on the article: MPs attack Airtrack.

    This is a joke, they might as well close it for good and let us gridlocked!

    PS: if you did not click on all the links above, do check this one: HEATHROW – ARETIREMENTPLAN by Town and Country Planning.

    Tuesday, January 29, 2008

    Monday Mayhem at North Sheen level crossing

    The infamous North Sheen level crossing came once again to public attention on Monday morning. It was shut for most of the morning after someone drove into it (I don't have more details but it's what the PC guarding it told me). This meant major mayhem on the roads all around Richmond and Sheen....

    All interested parties in starting a campaign group for its removal contact me via the blog.

    Tuesday, November 20, 2007

    Disjointed (and not accessible)

    Posted some thoughts as comments on this Going Underground post:

    Wouldn't it great if the London transport network was more joined-up?

    Why are the two Edgware road stations not joined as one?
    Same question for the different Hammersmith station: why doesn't the Hammersmith & City line not going a bit further underground to join the District/Circle lines stations?)
    In Putney, why did they put tube and rail stations 150 m apart despite those two lines intersecting?

    What would it take to make this world-class (and maybe Olympic-class)?

    There would be immense benefits in commute time, as long changeovers can add 10-15 mn to a journey and are a major put off for people.

    Rethinking those stations would help commuters, much more than charging people for entering in the city by car -which no one in their right mind would do if they truly had the choice.

    Oh, and another thing would be to make the tube and trains more accessible. There are very few lifts in the tube, and I've been campaigning for quite a while to install a new footbridge in North Sheen. Of course it would be better to find ways to make the station accessible to wheelchairs (and buggies), especially since Richmond isn't either....



    Tags: , , , , , ,

    Saturday, November 10, 2007

    Could this have been avoided?

    The whole neighboorhood has been talking about this tragic event, a there has been a fatality at North Sheen crossing:
    Man's death sparks new safety fears - Richmond Guardian
    It happenned right before children that were going to school...

    I feel really sad and concerned about this, not so because I have been campaigning for a footbridge at this station -little can prevent a suicide- but more because I feel strongly there should not be a crossing at all at this place. I am not the only one to have thought about this:
    New Crossrail plan proposed
    Of course, it would be great to have an underground station as we could dream of a parking on top to encourage commuters to leave their cars and take the train. Just a dream?



    Tags: , , , ,

    Friday, September 14, 2007

    Update on the update on the North Sheen station footbridge


    View Larger Map
    Following onto our campaign for a second footbridge at North Sheen station, we chased up our MP, Susan Kramer, who in turn chased again Network Rail.

    It has been slow progress, not for the lack of trying from Susan's office but because of inertia at Network Rail.

    In the meantime, the same Network Rail is spending its money on radio ads to keep reminding us how much level crossings are. We'd rather see them actually removing level crossings or making them safer: according to them, "an average of one person a month is killed at level crossings", most likely on one of the 1,521 sited on public roads.


    Read also:

    Tags: , , , , ,

    Friday, August 31, 2007

    Update on the North Sheen station footbridge

    Last year, following my posts on the footbridge at North Sheen station, the office of Susan Kramer emailed me back the options considered by Network Rail.

    As a reminder, the issue is that North Sheen has just a single footbridge and that pedestrians (and car) have to wait at the level crossing if they come from the Southern side of Manor road. Now, in any civilised country I've ever been to, a tunnel or a bridge would have been built to remove a level crossing in a dense urban fabric. Given the fact it is taking over 20 years to build a vital link such as Crossrail, I doubt this will happen in North Sheen so I've moved onto suggesting more pragmatic actions to remove the need for pedestrians to wait at the crossing. There is a serious safety implication, as there are no less than 5 schools within half a mile and kids just jump the barriers to cross.

    You will find below those options, verbatim. My views are that the third option is interesting however it would make the access to the station even more concealed and difficult to find, however it would be easier to drop off passengers. We could even dream of a bike parking there to encourage carbon friendly commuting (would require CCTV surveillance to deter thieves).

    Additionally and a more radical option would be a double bridge at the Eastern end of the platform. On the South side, this could link Sheen Court and/or Upper Richmond road respectively via the allotments and via Holy Trinity school (this would require to extend the pathway through the side of the school and along Sheen Court. Is is relevant here to note that Sheen court has 200 flats and Courtlands opposite is a similarly dense development, both currently have to walk a detour to go to the station -and be stuck at the crossing for up to 15 mn.

    On the North side, this could link Manor grove, providing access to the neighbourhood around Bicester road, Somerton avenue and Lambert avenue -again a denser development.

    This would give North Sheen three accesses and make quite a difference for local residents and encourage commuting by train. Then more than four trains per hour would be nice, but that's another story.


    NETWORK RAIL PROPOSALS


    North Sheen Station – Summary of Draft Options


    Network Rail, following appeals by local residents and elected figures, is exploring possible options to address the widespread misuse of the level crossing at North Sheen Station.

    The options are in discussion stage and Network Rail would like the views of local residents and elected figures before developing any option beyond this initial point. (NB: No specific costs/ funding sources have been identified.)


    Option 1 – Extension of footbridge to connect with the old pathway and relocation of the signalling box blocking access to this pathway.

    Pros:

    • Add an extending arm to the footbridge relatively in-expensive

    • Open up the old pathway to access the south of the level crossing


    Cons:

    • Relocation of the signalling equipment and reintegration with local signalling systems.

    • Closure of the railway line

    • Timescale of the work likely to be lengthy

    • All enhancements (i.e. new infrastructure on the railway) need to be DDA compliant.


    Note: So, why did they remove the bridge in the first place then?



    Option 2 - Install a completely new footbridge on the west side of the level crossing

    Pros:

    • Provision of crossing point for those south of the level crossing.

    • Could be used by all pedestrians on Manor Road.


    Cons:

    • Possible interference with the sight-lines of train drivers approaching the crossing

    • All enhancements (i.e. new infrastructure on the railway) need to be DDA compliant.

    • The western side of the crossing has residential buildings.



    Option 3 – Extension of the footbridge to the old path, connection of the old path with a new route through the allotments.


    Pros

    • Extension of the footbridge and reinstating the old path relatively in-expensive

    • No need to move critical signalling equipment


    Cons

    • Purchase of land from the allotments

    • New path next to residential properties (lights etc)

    • All enhancements (i.e. new infrastructure on the railway) need to be DDA compliant.





    Tags: , , ,

    Tuesday, April 04, 2006

    Level crossing tragedy in Barnes

    In a bizarre twist, only a few weeks after I posted this, Tony sent me the following link about a famous photographer killed on March 25th by a train at the White Hart Lane level crossing:
    Carlos Clarke inquest 'opened and adjourned' (Amateur Photographer, 29/03/06)

    Often compared to Helmut Newton, Bob Carlos Clarke attracted acclaim and controversy. See his obituaries here and there.

    It is not only that the art world just lost an icon which saddens me, but also that this should not happen. Level crossings have no place in a dense urban environment and should be removed.

    Here's the text of an email I have received only two days after this tragic death from Susan Kramer's office (our local MP) in response to my campaign for a footbridge at North Sheen:

    The current situation is that Network Rail is now in the process of designing options for a footbridge. Whilst this is far from a guarantee that the work will go ahead, it is nevertheless a crucial start. However, in an effort to keep up the pressure on Network Rail to carry it out, we are currently gathering signatures as part of the petition which I mentioned in my earlier email, and once we have a sufficient large number then we will formally present it to Network Rail.

    Of course, a footbridge is only a stop gap measure and it goes without saying that level crossings have no place whatsoever in a city.


    Tags:

    Monday, March 20, 2006

    Another train tragedy in waiting at North Sheen?

    I've read with despair accounts of the Edmonton rail tragedy in which two boys, both 16, died at an un-protected rail crossing.

    No later than last week, I've seen four Christ Church schoolboys jumping the automatic (unmanned) barriers at North Sheen train station -when they are down, there is no footbridge to cross the railway and the wait is often over 10mn. In a separate instance, another young man did the same thing.

    I've raised the subject many times with our local MP, Susan Kramer, as adding a footbridge was one of her electoral promises. Apparently she had meetings on the subject:

    Thank you for your recent email to Susan Kramer MP, regarding the above issue. During the last few months, Susan has been trying to arrange a meeting with senior representatives from Network Rail in order to discuss this issue.

    I am happy to report that Susan has now had two separate such meetings with representatives from Network Rail, who have advised her that they have now launched a consultation as part of their South West London Route Utilisation Strategy - during which this issue will be given due consideration.However, in an effort to make sure that this issue is given the level of consideration that it deserves, Susan has now written to the Chief Executive of Network Rail, Mr. John Armitt, to raise this matter directly with him.

    Additionally, we soon hope to launch a petition to Network Rail, calling upon the company to provide proper footbridge access to North Sheen Station as part of the changes implemented in their South West London Utilisation Strategy mentioned above.


    Very kind answer indeed, still no footbridge.


    del.icio.us tag for my other posts on the same subject: footbridge+richmondtransits.blog

    Tags: , , , , , ,